When Tanzania settled a long dispute in 2019, it took the state's stake free of any loan and fixed an equal split of total economic benefits in numbers.

Key facts

Exhibit 1
ChapterWhat Tanzania did
4. Settlement agreement20 October 2019: Barrick agreed to pay US$300 million to settle all tax and other disputes (Barrick)
3. State stakeThe government holds a 16% free carried stake in each of the Bulyanhulu, North Mara and Buzwagi mines (Barrick)
7. Benefit splitEconomic benefits are shared 50/50; the state's half counts taxes, royalties, clearing fees and its share of cash distributions; an annual true-up keeps the 50/50 split (Barrick)
5. Company structureA new company, Twiga Minerals, manages the three mines and gives the government full visibility of and participation in operating decisions (Barrick)
12. DisputesAn Africa-focused international dispute resolution framework; the concentrate export ban was lifted (Barrick)
8. Local content96% of the workforce is Tanzanian and 49% comes from nearby communities; more than 90% of procurement goes to Tanzanian suppliers (Barrick)
ResultsUS$4.79 billion injected into Tanzania's economy since 2019, including US$558 million in the first half of 2025 (Barrick)

What Mongolia can copy

  • Take the state's stake as a free carried interest, not a loan, so no debt builds up and dividends are not pushed back.
  • Agree the split of total benefits (taxes + royalties + dividends) in numbers, not just an equity percentage.
  • Reconcile the split every year and correct any gap the next year. Oyu Tolgoi's 53% target could be measured this way.

What doesn't transfer directly

  • Tanzania's deal followed an export ban and a mine closure; that path carries a high cost in investor confidence.
  • It came when Barrick took over the mines from Acacia, giving both sides a fresh start.

This profile is part of the report Fair Contracts, Fair Returns and focuses on chapters 3–5 of the 12-chapter template. Research on the other chapters is in progress.

Sources