Skip to content

Insights·Revenue management

Sharing Resource Wealth: What Mongolia's National Wealth Fund Can Learn from Norway, Chile, Botswana and Alaska

Four models for turning mineral wealth into lasting public benefit, and what Mongolia can copy from each

By Dulguun Maidar

Report|October 31, 2026|14 min read

Key takeaways

Mongolia laid the foundation in 2024 with the National Wealth Fund Law and a savings account for every citizen. What separates the world's best models is not having a fund but having hard spending rules, independent management, and transparent reporting.

  1. Norway spends only the fund's expected real return (about 3% a year), never the capital, so the wealth passes intact to the next generation.
  2. Chile budgets on the long-term copper price, not today's price. It saves windfalls in booms and draws on them in downturns, the model most directly usable for copper- and coal-dependent Mongolia.
  3. Chile's 2023 royalty law sends US$450 million a year to regions and municipalities by formula, a working example of a legislated local share.
  4. Botswana owns its main diamond mines 50:50 with De Beers and negotiated its share of sales up from 25% to 50%. Yet the 2024–2026 diamond slump shows that even the best deal cannot protect an undiversified economy.
  5. Alaska pays every resident a cash dividend from fund returns (US$1,200 in 2026). Public support is strong, but the amount is now set by legislators every year, which has politicised it.
  6. For Mongolia: protect the Savings Fund with a legislated spending rule, make fund management independent, publish strategic deposit contracts, and set the local share by formula. The final section turns this into a three-phase path.

Mongolia today

Mongolia has passed its fund law, opened an account for every citizen, and was named one of the most improved funds internationally. The spending rule, independence of management, and distribution from major deposits are still unsettled.

Exhibit 1
ItemStatus
LawParliament passed the National Wealth Fund Law on 19 April 2024 (MLSP)
StructureFuture Heritage Fund, Development Fund, Savings Fund; renamed the Chinggis Fund in December 2024 (Wikipedia)
Savings Fund sources34% of dividends from Erdenes Mongol mining subsidiaries plus special royalties from private miners (swf.gov.mn)
Citizen accountsOne for each of 3.6 million citizens; about US$49 each as of December 2025; locked until 2030 (GlobalSWF)
Total assetsAbout US$2.3 billion (GlobalSWF)
International ratingGSR governance score rose from 12% to 44%; named most improved fund of 2026 (GlobalSWF)
New proposal (May 2026)Bill requiring at least 60% of benefits from strategic deposits to reach citizens through the fund, with a regulatory fee if the share falls short (MI24)
Oyu TolgoiRio Tinto 66%, Erdenes Oyu Tolgoi 34%; the 2022 agreement waived US$2.4 billion of debt; about 500 kt of copper a year in 2028–2036 (Rio Tinto 20-F, Mining News)

Main risk. An Open Society Forum policy brief points to the earlier failures of the Human Development Fund, the Development Bank and the SME Support Fund (OSF No. 50). The lesson of the four models below is not how to create a fund but how to protect one.

Research framework: the 12-chapter template

Every country is studied under the same 12 chapters, so any two countries, and Mongolia, can be compared line by line. This report focuses on chapters 6 (revenue management) and 7 (benefit distribution).

Exhibit 2
No.ChapterKey question
1Legal and constitutional basisWho owns the subsoil, and how are licences granted?
2Fiscal regimeWhat share of profit does the state take, and how stable are the terms?
3State participationDoes the state hold equity, and how are state companies governed?
4Investment agreementsAre contracts published, and are they renegotiated?
5Company structure and financeJV design, loans, transfer pricing
6Revenue managementFunds, fiscal rules, stabilisation
7Benefit distributionNational, regional, local and citizen shares
8Local content and processingJobs, suppliers, in-country processing
9Land, water, environment, closureHerders' pasture, water rights, closure guarantees
10Transparency and accountabilityEITI, beneficial ownership, audits
11Infrastructure and logisticsRail, ports, exports from a landlocked country
12Consent and dispute resolutionHow citizens, companies and state settle disputes

Each country section ends with "What Mongolia can copy" and "What doesn't transfer directly."

Norway: never spending the capital

Norway takes 78% of petroleum profits in tax, puts its revenue into the world's largest fund, and each year spends only the expected return (3%). It has topped the resource governance index (Compliance Week).

Exhibit 3
ChapterWhat Norway does
2. Tax22% ordinary tax plus 71.8% special tax, for a 78% marginal rate; petroleum tax revenue estimated at NOK 291.5 billion in 2026 (Norsk Petroleum)
3. State companyThe state owns 67% of Equinor, which is run on commercial terms; the stake is managed by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries (Norsk Petroleum)
3. Direct stake (SDFI)Direct state holdings in fields and pipelines, managed by Petoro (about 80 staff); net cash flow about NOK 193 billion in 2026 (Norsk Petroleum)
6. FundGovernment Pension Fund Global: about US$2.5 trillion (October 2026) (Wikipedia)
6. Fiscal ruleOver time the structural non-oil deficit should equal the fund's real return (3%, cut from 4% in 2017); more can be spent in downturns, less in upturns (Norsk Petroleum, Norges Bank)
7. DistributionNo cash payments; transfers from the fund finance about 27% of the 2026 central government budget, reaching citizens through public services (Government of Norway)

What Mongolia can copy

  • Legislate the withdrawal as a fixed percentage, so politicians stop fighting over how much to take each year.
  • Separate state ownership from commercial management: the ministry owns, a professional board runs the company.
  • A small, professional Petoro-style holder for state stakes, which runs no mines and only oversees the state's share.

What doesn't transfer directly

  • Mongolia has to build its institutions while the revenue is already flowing.
  • A 78% rate fits highly profitable offshore oil, not Mongolia's copper and coal deposits and investment risk profile.

Chile: the closest copper-country model

Since 2001 Chile has budgeted on the long-term copper price and saved the surplus in a stabilisation fund; since 2023 it shares royalty revenue with regions by formula. Its copper sector ranked 2nd of 89 assessments, and state-owned Codelco ranked 1st among state companies (NRGI 2017).

Exhibit 4
ChapterWhat Chile does
2. Royalty (2023)For producers above 50 kt of copper a year: a 1% ad valorem tax plus a margin-based tax; maximum effective rate of 46.5% for producers above 80 kt (DLA Piper, LatinNews)
6. Fiscal ruleStructural balance rule: spending is set by the revenue the state would earn at potential GDP and the long-term copper price (BIS)
6. Independent inputsIndependent expert committees set potential GDP and the long-term copper price; the Fiscal Council observes (World Bank)
6. FundEconomic and Social Stabilization Fund (FEES), founded 2007 with US$2.58 billion; US$3.9 billion at end-May 2026 (Hacienda, Dipres)
6. UseDrawn down in bad years instead of borrowing; in 2024, three withdrawals of US$800m, US$607m and US$1,000m (Hacienda)
7. Regional sharingUS$450m a year from the royalty: US$225m regional development fund, US$170m territorial equity fund for the poorest municipalities, US$55m for mining municipalities (InvestChile)
7. ResultsIn April 2024, CLP 93.6 billion transferred to 307 municipalities with over 12 million residents (Mining Reporters)

What Mongolia can copy

  • Budget on long-term copper and coal prices set by an independent expert committee, not the Ministry of Finance.
  • Split a fixed share of royalties three ways by formula: all aimags, the poorest soums, and soums affected by mining (for example Khanbogd and Tsogttsetsii).
  • Publish state mining company reports to Codelco's standard.

What doesn't transfer directly

  • Chile's rule rests on 20+ years of an independent central bank and a professional finance ministry; Mongolia should first protect the price committee's independence in law.
  • Chile has seaports; Mongolia's exports depend on borders and rail, which adds logistics risk on top of price swings.

Botswana: the joint-venture model and the diversification lesson

Botswana did not nationalise its mines. It formed a 50:50 joint venture with De Beers (Debswana) and shares the profit through tax, dividends and royalties. But the diamond slump since 2024 has shrunk the economy two years running, showing the risk of depending on one commodity.

Exhibit 5
ChapterWhat Botswana does
3. Joint ventureDebswana runs the Jwaneng, Orapa, Letlhakane and Damtshaa mines; government and De Beers own 50% each (Jewellery News)
4. RenegotiationUnder the deal concluded in February 2025, state-owned Okavango Diamond Company's share of output starts at 30% and reaches 50% within 10 years (previously 25%); licences extended to 2054 (IDEX, Jewellery News)
8. Diversification fundDe Beers puts US$75m into a Diamonds for Development Fund, potentially US$750m over 10 years (Jewellery News)
6. Fiscal ruleSustainable Budget Index (since 1994): recurrent spending outside health and education must be covered by non-mineral revenue, so mineral revenue goes to investment (CCSI, Daily News)
6. SavingsNDP 11 proposed saving 40% of mineral revenue for future generations and investing 60% in development (WAVES)
Slump (2024–2026)Economy shrank 3% in 2024 (IMF); 2025–26 mineral revenue of BWP 10.3 billion, under half the historic average (Your Botswana); debt projected to breach the 40% legal ceiling (BusinessDay)

What Mongolia can copy

  • Instead of the state running mines, form equal joint ventures with experienced partners who supply professional management.
  • Negotiate marketing rights, not just equity: the right for Mongolia to sell a set share of copper and coal concentrate itself.
  • When extending agreements, require fixed contributions to a diversification fund.
  • An SBI-style rule that recurrent spending is covered by non-mining revenue.

What doesn't transfer directly

  • Botswana built 50 years of stable partnership with one investor; Mongolia's relations with foreign investors have been less stable, so contract trust must be rebuilt first.
  • Botswana's biggest lesson is a warning: dependence on diamonds and lapses in its own rules let the budget deteriorate fast.

Alaska: a direct dividend to every citizen

Alaska created its fund by constitutional amendment in 1976 and has paid every resident an annual cash dividend since 1982. It is the closest model to Mongolia's Savings Fund, and both its strengths and weaknesses apply directly.

Exhibit 6
ChapterWhat Alaska does
1. LawThe fund is established in the state constitution (Art. IX, sec. 15); 25% of mineral lease rentals and royalties flow into it (Alaska Legislature)
6. FundOver US$85 billion, the largest sovereign fund in the US (BusinessWire)
6. Spending ruleAnnual draw of 5% of the fund's five-year average market value (POMV) (BusinessWire)
7. Citizen dividendUS$1,200 per person in 2026 (US$1,000 dividend + US$200 energy relief), paid from 1 October (Alaska Beacon, Cronista)
7. WeaknessSince 2017 the dividend size has been fought over by legislators every year; fund earnings now pay for 50–60% of state operations (ADN, Juneau Empire)
7. PoliticisationSince 2020, dividends have been larger in election years than in non-election years (Juneau Empire)

What Mongolia can copy

  • Lock the fund's revenue source (a fixed royalty share) into the constitution or law.
  • Calculate withdrawals as a fixed percentage of five-year average assets, so one bad market year does not swing citizens' benefit.
  • Write the citizen dividend formula into law and take it out of the annual budget fight.

What doesn't transfer directly

  • Cash risks becoming an election tool; given Mongolia's experience with Human Development Fund cash handouts, keeping the current focus on housing, education and health is sensible.
  • Alaska has a small population and a large fund; Mongolia's per-citizen balance is still small, so accumulating first works better than paying out cash.

Comparison table

Against the four models, Mongolia's biggest gaps are the spending rule and a local-sharing formula.

Exhibit 7
QuestionNorwayChileBotswanaAlaskaMongolia (2026)
Fund size~US$2.5 trillionFEES US$3.9 billionPula Fund (US$4.1 billion in 2022)US$85+ billion~US$2.3 billion
Spending ruleReal return ~3%Structural balance, long-term copper priceSBI: recurrent spending from non-mineral revenue5% of five-year averageFiscal Stability Law (structural balance); no clear numeric withdrawal rule for the fund
Who sets prices and parametersParliament, Ministry of FinanceIndependent expert committeesMinistry of FinanceLegislatorsTo be clarified
State stakeEquinor 67%, SDFICodelco 100%Debswana 50%None directlyOyu Tolgoi 34%, Erdenes Mongol
How citizens benefitBudget (27%) → public servicesBudget + three regional fundsEducation, health, infrastructureAnnual cash (US$1,200)Personal savings account (locked until 2030)
Local shareThrough the national budgetUS$450m a year by formulaThrough the national budgetState budgetBill under discussion
Key lessonSpend the return, not the capitalDecouple the budget from the price cycleJoint venture + diversificationCitizen ownership + politicisation riskLegislate rules and independence

Sources are in each country section; Pula Fund figure: Centurion.

A three-phase path for Mongolia

Combining the best of the four models for Mongolia: first protect the rules, then formalise distribution, then renew contracts and diversify.

Exhibit 8
PhaseActionModelOwner
1. Protect the rules (0–12 months)Legislate a numeric withdrawal rule (fixed share of five-year average assets)Norway, AlaskaParliament, Ministry of Finance
Create an independent expert committee to set long-term copper and coal pricesChileMinistry of Finance, Fiscal Council
Require a majority of independent members on the fund board; publish quarterly reportsNorway, ChileParliament, Chinggis Fund
2. Formalise distribution (1–2 years)Share a fixed part of royalties by formula among aimags, the poorest soums and mining soumsChileParliament, Government
Set Savings Fund use (housing, education, health) in law and remove it from the annual budget fightAlaska (lesson)Parliament
Add an SBI-style test to budget law: recurrent spending covered by non-mining revenueBotswanaMinistry of Finance
3. Renew contracts and diversify (2–5 years)Publish strategic deposit contractsChile, NorwayMinistry of Mining
A small professional holder of state stakes (Petoro-style)NorwayErdenes Mongol
In renewals, negotiate marketing rights and contributions to a diversification fundBotswanaGovernment

This path is a policy proposal, not a legal opinion; each phase needs detailed work with lawyers, economists and fund specialists.

Sources

Mongolia

Norway

Chile

Botswana

Alaska

Read in Mongolian →

Authors

  • Dulguun Maidar

    Ulaanbaatar

Related research

Get new research by email